Skip to main content

Weinn v. State

Citations

  • 326 S.W.3d 189
  • 2010 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 793
  • 2010 WL 2595009

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding simultaneous manufacture and resulting possession with intent to deliver when involving a single quantity of controlled substance only constitutes one offense
  • holding argument asking the jury to consider who drugs might be delivered to can be a proper plea for law enforcement
  • stating that double jeopardy is violated when there is “a second prosecution for the same offense after conviction” (quoting Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 (1977))
  • holding a single act of simultaneous manufacture and resulting possession with intent to deliver with respect to a single quantity of a controlled substance constitutes a single violation
  • holding a single act of simultaneous manufacture and resulting possession with intent to deliver with respect to a single quantity of a controlled substance constitutes a single violation
  • applying Ervin factors where offenses have different elements under Blockburger

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Meyers, Price, Womack, Holcomb, Cochran, Keller, Keasler, Hervey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Weinn v. State

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.