Skip to main content

Garza v. State

Citations

  • 632 N.W.2d 633
  • 2001 WL 923588

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “the good faith of the police cannot cure the absence of particularized circumstances in the warrant application”
  • concluding that “[b]ecause the state failed to take advantage of its opportunity to build a factual record with respect to [a newly raised issue], we do not believe that resolution of the issue is necessary to the interests of justice”
  • remanding to the trial court when record was insufficient to determine whether an area was curtilage
  • applying the exclusionary rule despite law enforcement’s good-faith reliance on an issued warrant because it lacked the “sufficiently particularized circumstances” required to justify an unannounced entry
  • recognizing resident’s privacy interest in detached storage shed
  • recognizing resident’s privacy interest in detached storage shed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stringer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.