Supreme Court of Minnesota· 8/16/2001
Garza v. State
Citations
- 632 N.W.2d 633
- 2001 WL 923588
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “the good faith of the police cannot cure the absence of particularized circumstances in the warrant application”
- concluding that “[b]ecause the state failed to take advantage of its opportunity to build a factual record with respect to [a newly raised issue], we do not believe that resolution of the issue is necessary to the interests of justice”
- remanding to the trial court when record was insufficient to determine whether an area was curtilage
- applying the exclusionary rule despite law enforcement’s good-faith reliance on an issued warrant because it lacked the “sufficiently particularized circumstances” required to justify an unannounced entry
- recognizing resident’s privacy interest in detached storage shed
- recognizing resident’s privacy interest in detached storage shed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stringer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MiltonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-09-19· cited 139×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-05-24· cited 76×
- State v. BourkeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-08-03· cited 60×
- State v. LicariSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-04-17· cited 57×
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-01-25· cited 44×
- State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Bonnie Ann Lindquist, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-08-19· cited 42×
- United States v. James Ray MendozaEighth Circuit· 2002-04-02· cited 41×
- Price v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2002-11-27· cited 32×
- State v. LarsenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-08-29· cited 32×
- State v. GrunigSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-05-01· cited 31×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-10-21· cited 23×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-01-15· cited 20×
- State v. HerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-05-06· cited 8×
- State v. ChuteSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-03-14· cited 7×
- State v. AmundsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-04-11· cited 3×
- State of Minnesota v. Quentin Todd ChuteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2016-11-21· cited 2×
- State v. BotelhoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-01-02· cited 1×
- Kristy R. Garrison v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-07-07
- Price, Gilbert Colman v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2002-11-27
- Price, Gilbert Colman v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2002-09-12
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1997-04-28· cited 959×
- Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1995-05-22· cited 925×
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-08-29· cited 192×
- State v. ZanterSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-08-04· cited 111×
- State v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-06-02· cited 88×
- State v. LienSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-04-28· cited 75×
- State v. CreaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-09-12· cited 43×
- State v. WassonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-08-03· cited 38×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.