Skip to main content

Garza v. State

Citations

  • 137 S.W.3d 878
  • 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 4761
  • 2004 WL 1172323

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting, “[O]ther intermediate appellate courts ... have expressly declined to follow Autran, and the Court of Criminal Appeals has refused discretionary review in those cases in which a petition has been filed.”
  • “We note that peace officers need not independently investigate possible alternatives to impoundment absent some objec tively demonstrable evidence that alternatives did, in fact, exist”
  • “We note that peace officers need not independently investigate possible alternatives to impoundment absent some objectively demonstrable evidence that alternatives did, in fact, exist.”
  • “We note that peace officers need not independently investigate possible alternatives to impoundment absent some objectively demonstrable evidence that alternatives did, in fact, exist.”
  • ―We note that peace officers need not independently investigate possible alternatives to impoundment absent some objectively demonstrable evidence that alternatives did, in fact, exist.‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Terry Jennings

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.