Skip to main content

Garza v. State

Citations

  • 670 S.E.2d 73
  • 284 Ga. 696
  • 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 3470
  • 2008 Ga. LEXIS 865

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • kidnapping statute intended to address “movement serving to substantially isolate the victim from protection or rescue”
  • establishing the four-factor test adopted by Garza and holding that a short involuntary night-time drive to a beach where victim was robbed did not satisfy kidnapping statute
  • overruling three decades of precedent requiring only slight movement under kidnapping statute
  • establishing new factors for assessing the asportation element of Georgia's pre-2009 kidnapping statute
  • evil addressed by kidnapping statute is “movement serving to substantially isolate the victim from protection or rescue”
  • no evidence that movement served to conceal the victim from police, particularly where police were already aware that the victim was being detained

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley, Hines, Hunstein, Melton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

171 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.