Skip to main content

Cardenas v. State

Citations

  • 325 S.W.3d 179
  • 2010 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1391
  • 2010 WL 4483494

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a trial court may rehabilitate a venireperson who initially expresses an incapability of following the law
  • holding that defense counsel did not have to ask panel members a further question to properly preserve his denied challenges for cause
  • holding commitment question proper that limited facts included in question to statutory elements or statutory manners and means
  • stating that permissible boundaries may be crossed when the question includes verbiage asking about the consideration of particular punishment based on interjected evidentiary facts
  • stating that permissible boundaries may be crossed when the question includes verbiage asking about the consideration of particular punishment based on interjected evidentiary facts
  • holding commitment question proper that limited facts included in question to statutory elements or statutory manners and means

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.