Skip to main content
· 1/17/1990

Rezac v. State

Citations

  • 782 S.W.2d 869
  • 1990 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 6
  • 1990 WL 2417

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial court objection stating one legal basis may not be used to support a different legal theory on appeal
  • holding that an argument is not preserved for appellate review if the trial court did not have an opportunity to rule on it
  • holding that an argument is not preserved for appellate review if the trial court did not have an opportunity to rule on it
  • holding that an argument is not preserved for appellate review if the trial court did not have an opportunity to rule on it
  • holding that an argument is not preserved for appellate review if the trial court did not have an opportunity to rule on it
  • holding that a trial court objection stating one legal basis may not be used to support a different legal theory on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Clinton, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.