Jagaroo v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that sentence within punishment range was not cruel and unusual and stating that counsel is not ineffective by refraining from “making frivolous arguments and objections”
• observing that because appellant’s punishment was within statutory range, it was not cruel and unusual, and trial court would not have erred in overruling counsel’s objection to punishment had one been made, thus appellant did not establish ineffective assistance of counsel
• stating trial counsel's failure to object did not amount to ineffective assistance of counsel when objection would have been futile
• involving a complaint that counsel failed to present mitigating evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).