Skip to main content

Flores v. State

Citations

  • 245 S.W.3d 432
  • 2008 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 218
  • 2008 WL 375421

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it is a “well-established requirement that [an] appellant must preserve an ‘as applied’ constitutional challenge by raising it at trial”
  • concluding that appellant waived equal protection claim when he neglected to raise issue at trial
  • holding that any error in not instructing jury on felony murder was harmless when trial court instructed jury on manslaughter and injury to child and jury found defendant guilty of greater charged offense
  • holding that defendant charged with murder was not entitled to instruction on deadly conduct when “the evidence on which the defendant is relying raises another offense that ‘lies between’ the requested and charged offenses”
  • concluding that deadly conduct is a lesser included offense of capital murder
  • stating that “proof of intent would, as a matter of law, establish recklessness as well”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, Meyers, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Cochran, Johnson, Price, Holcomb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

137 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.