Swearingen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a witness’s “conclusory statement” that “individuals deposit their DNA on objects that they touch” was not “concrete evidence that biological material existed on the evidence sought to be tested”
• holding that a witness’s “conclusory statement” that “individuals deposit their DNA on objects that they touch” was not “concrete evidence that biological material existed on the evidence sought to be tested”
• stating that “a mere assertion or a general claim” will not satisfy Chapter 64 burden
• stating that “a mere assertion or a general claim” will not satisfy the Chapter 64 burden
• stating that “a mere 5 assertion or a general claim” will not satisfy an appellant’s Chapter 64 burden
• stating that “a mere assertion or a general claim” will not satisfy Chapter 64 burden

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).