Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 122 S.W.3d 794
  • 2003 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 910
  • 2003 WL 22849864

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial judge must refrain from making any remark calculated to convey his opinion of the case because jurors give special and peculiar weight to the language and conduct of the trial judge
  • holding that a trial judge must refrain from making any remark calculated to convey his opinion of the case because jurors give special and peculiar weight to the language and conduct of the trial judge
  • concluding that jury may infer intent from any facts in evidence
  • noting that instruction could violate Article 36.14 “less obviously” by singling out evidence and “inviting the jury to pay particular attention to it”
  • stating jury may infer intent “from any facts in evidence which it determines proves the existence of such intent to kill, such as the use of a deadly weapon”
  • stating intent to kill can be inferred from defendant’s “use of a deadly weapon”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack, Johnson, Holcomb, Hervey, Keasler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

373 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.