Skip to main content
· 2/14/2007

Deener v. State

Citations

  • 214 S.W.3d 522
  • 2006 WL 3479941

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding Confrontation Clause claims must be preserved by timely and specific objection
  • improper comment on weight of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justices Morris, Moseley, and Richter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.