Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 4/25/2007
Garrett v. State
Citations
- 220 S.W.3d 926
- 2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 502
- 2007 WL 1217220
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- approving the focus exclusively on evidence supporting the element upon which the mandatory presumption related
- “Rule 38.1 requires that an appellant designate all issues for review in the original brief.”
- standard for harm relating to unobjected-to constitutionally erroneous presumption' in jury charge was the same as egregious harm
- inclusion of unconstitutional mandatory presumption in jury charge was harmless because the instruction did not relate to contested issue at trial
- involving the identical instruction found in § 22.02(c
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holcomb, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Cochran, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wolfe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2017-02-15· cited 828×
- Tottenham v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2009-07-01· cited 86×
- Arnold v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2007-06-14· cited 65×
- Black v. ShorCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2013-04-18· cited 44×
- Paul Black v. Toby Shor and Seashore Investments Management TrustTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2013-04-18· cited 39×
- Raven Ryon Lovings v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2012-08-14· cited 25×
- Tomas Jimenez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2013-12-17· cited 14×
- Nilda Iliana Rodriguez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2013-07-31· cited 9×
- In the Matter of C.D.H., a JuvenileTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-12-16· cited 7×
- Allen v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2007-08-22· cited 6×
- Roman Ramirez-Memije v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-05-19· cited 5×
- Joe Shawn Hollander v. State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2012-09-06· cited 5×
- Robert Emmanuel Digman v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2014-12-24· cited 3×
- In Re CDHTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-12-16
- Melissa Ann Mercer v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2015-07-02
- Joe Pace v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2007-10-11
- Earl Tottenham v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2009-01-29
- Mary Alvis Johnson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2002-08-26
- Darla Gayle Jackson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2006-08-30
- Larry Darnell Allen v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2007-08-22
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-02-27· cited 6,557×
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 2,053×
- Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-06-18· cited 1,033×
- Rezac v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-01-17· cited 732×
- Carella v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1989-08-30· cited 686×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-12-03· cited 467×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-05-25· cited 374×
- Jimenez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-09-13· cited 225×
- Willis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-05-16· cited 210×
- Pena v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-04-26· cited 181×
- Rochelle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-05-16· cited 128×
- Rogers v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-10-17· cited 94×
- Romero v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1996-09-19· cited 34×
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2005-01-27· cited 24×
- Randle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-06-08· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.