Skip to main content

Willis v. State

Citations

  • 790 S.W.2d 307
  • 1990 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 80
  • 1990 WL 63943

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Sanders speaks too generally in deciding that all defenses are in nature of confession and avoidance
  • recognizing that “the power to create and define offenses rests within the sound discretion of the legislative branch of government” and that this “necessarily includes the power to establish and define the defenses to criminal offenses”
  • holding denial of knowledge that goods were stolen did not preclude submission of justification defense of good faith purchase
  • holding denial of knowledge that goods were stolen did not preclude submission of justification defense of good faith purchase
  • noting that a defendant may be entitled to a defensive instruction where he merely negates an element of an offense, but does not negate the entire offense
  • stating that when statutory defense would negate the culpable mental state element and the defendant has raised evidence supporting the defense, the defendant is entitled to a jury instruction on the defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCORMICK

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

141 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.