· 6/6/2005
Boones v. State
Citations
- 170 S.W.3d 653
- 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 4311
- 2005 WL 1320190
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by reinstating excluded juror when defendant did not expressly assert any statutory rights
- holding, where defendant did not expressly assert any statutory rights, that trial court did not abuse its discretion by reinstating excluded juror
- recognizing Bowman as holding that decision to reinstate excluded venire members was acceptable remedy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.