Skip to main content
· 6/6/2005

Boones v. State

Citations

  • 170 S.W.3d 653
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 4311
  • 2005 WL 1320190

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by reinstating excluded juror when defendant did not expressly assert any statutory rights
  • holding, where defendant did not expressly assert any statutory rights, that trial court did not abuse its discretion by reinstating excluded juror
  • recognizing Bowman as holding that decision to reinstate excluded venire members was acceptable remedy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.