Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 911 S.W.2d 744
  • 1995 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 131
  • 1995 WL 732919

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the affirmative link between the appellant and the controlled substance need not be so strong that it excludes every other outstanding reasonable hypothesis except the appellant’s guilt
  • noting that our law requires that an accused must have been “conscious of his connection with [the illegal substance] and have known what it was”
  • noting that evidence which links the defendant to the controlled substance suffices for proof that he possessed it knowingly
  • noting that circumstantial evidence often has equal or even greater probative value than direct evidence
  • noting that our law requires that an accused must have been “conscious of his connection with [the illegal substance] and have known what it was”
  • explaining that A affirmative link @ is merely shorthand for what must be proven in a prosecution for possession of illegal drugs, such as awareness and control

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Baird

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

866 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Brown v. State

4,355 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.