Skip to main content

Watts v. State

Citations

  • 99 S.W.3d 604
  • 2003 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 58
  • 2003 WL 1056377

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the court may take judicial notice that the City of Austin is located in Travis County
  • stating the court may take judicial notice that the City of Austin is located in Travis County
  • stating the court may take judicial notice that the City of Austin is located in Travis County
  • noting it “would waste limited judicial resources and defy common sense” to insist that a party prove commonly known or readily ascertainable facts, such as a city’s location
  • “Texas courts can, of course, take judicial notice of the laws of this State.”
  • “[I]n a criminal case, for purposes of establishing venue, a trial or appellate judge might take judicial notice that the City of Austin, where the offense allegedly occurred, is within Travis County.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran, Meyers, Price, Johnson, Holcomb, Keasler, Womack, Keller, Hervey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.