Skip to main content

Hayes v. State

Citations

  • 85 S.W.3d 809
  • 2002 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 154
  • 2002 WL 31019283

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that autopsy photographs showing entry and exit wounds were relevant to explain the way in which the victim was killed
  • holding alterations of body by autopsy process are of minor significance when disturbing nature of photographs derive primarily from injuries sustained
  • holding alterations of body by autopsy process are of minor significance when disturbing nature of photographs derive primarily from injuries sustained
  • stating that autopsy photographs are generally admissible unless they depict mutilation caused by the autopsy itself
  • stating that the circumstances of the offense alone may be sufficient to support an affirmative answer to the future dangerousness special issue
  • stating that in cases of non- constitutional error, “any error that does not affect a substantial right of the appellant is harmless”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

222 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.