Zakrzewski v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Court emphasized that officer did not enter defendant's \home with the intent to seize evidence or make an arrest\ in concluding that entry was permissible
• “[w]here defense counsel’s failure to litigate a Fourth Amendment claim competently is the principal allegation of ineffectiveness, the defendant must also prove that his Fourth Amendment claim is meritorious.”
• affirming circuit court’s denial of Zakrzewski’s initial rule 3.851 motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).