Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 6/28/2000

Wright v. State

Citations

28 S.W.3d 526
2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 69
2000 WL 839948

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that, when appellant objected to hearsay testimony, but not under the Confrontation Clause, appellant waived the constitutional argument on appeal
holding that when appellant objected to hearsay testimony but not under Confrontation Clause appellant waived constitutional argument on appeal
holding that a hearsay objection does not preserve a Confrontation Clause objection for appellate review
holding that an objection at trial is required to preserve error on Confrontation Clause grounds
holding that the appellant's Sixth Amendment right to confrontation had been waived because he failed to object under the Confrontation Clause
holding that when appellant objected to hearsay testimony but not under Confrontation Clause appellant waived constitutional argument on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, McCormick, Meyers, Mansfield, Price, Holland, Womack, Keasler, Keller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

396 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Wright v. State

1,371 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.