Supreme Court of Florida· 10/14/2010

Everett v. State

Citations

54 So. 3d 464
2010 WL 4007643

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a decision not to call a witness based on concern over the witness’s credibility was not deficient
concluding that a decision to not call a witness based on concern over the witness’ credibility was not deficient
holding that Ring and Apprendi claims were procedurally barred because they were raised and rejected on direct appeal
“This Court has also consistently held that a trial counsel’s decision to not call certain witnesses to testify at trial can be reasonable trial strategy.”
“[T]rial counsel's decision to not call certain witnesses to testify at trial can be reasonable trial strategy.”
“That there may have been more that trial counsel could have done or that new counsel in reviewing the record with hindsight would handle the case differently, does not mean that trial counsel’s performance during the guilt phase was deficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canady, Labarga, Lewis, Pariente, Perry, Polston, Quince

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.