Skip to main content

Archer v. State

Citations

  • 934 So. 2d 1187
  • 2006 WL 1766760

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming denial of postconviction relief \because a recantation which is not credible would not produce an acquittal or a life sentence on retrial\
  • rejecting rationale that the affidavit of a recanting witness cannot be considered “newly discovered” because defendant knew at the time of the trial that the witness was lying
  • noting that recantations are “exceedingly unreliable”
  • “A recantation will not be considered newly discovered evidence where the recantation offers nothing new or where the recantation is offered by an untrustworthy individual who gave inconsistent statements all along.”
  • “[T]he prosecutor is charged with possession of what the State possesses.... ”
  • affirming the postconviction court’s finding that Bon-ifay was not credible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.