United States v. Robert Feldman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, by introducing evidence, a defendant waives his Rule 29 motion made at the close of the government’s case
• “Where the [Rule 29] motion is waived by the presentation of evidence by the defendant in his own behalf and then renewed at the close of all the evidence . . . the sufficiency of the evidence must be judged upon the record as a whole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).