James Odom v. Microsoft Corporation, a Washington Corporation Best Buy Co., Inc., a Minnesota Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal without leave to amend where 3 17 plaintiff failed to correct deficiencies in complaint, where court had afforded plaintiff 18 opportunities to do so, and where court had given plaintiff notice of substantive problems with 19 || claims
• “The only aspects of wire fraud that require particularized allegations are the factual circumstances of the fraud itself.”
• “Our case 11 law does not permit plaintiffs to rely on anticipated discovery to satisfy . . . [Rule] 12(b)(6
• “The pleader must state the time, place, and specific content of the false representations” and “the identifies of the parties to the misrepresentation.”
• Rule 9(b) requires a 16 || particularity “so that the defendant can prepare an adequate answer’’
• Rule 9(b) requires particularity “so that the 16 defendant can prepare an adequate answer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).