· 6/17/1981
United States v. Turkette
Citations
- 452 U.S. 576
- 101 S. Ct. 2524
- 69 L. Ed. 2d 246
- 1981 U.S. LEXIS 32
- 49 U.S.L.W. 4743
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that, although enterprise and pattern are distinct elements of racketeering, evidence proving these elements “may in particular cases coalesce”
- holding that the term “enterprise” as used in RICO is not restricted to criminal enterprises
- holding that the term \enterprise\ as used in RICO is not restricted to criminal enterprises
- holding that RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises because the statute refers only to “enterprises”
- holding that an “enterprise” is “a group of persons associated together for a common purpose of engaging in a course of conduct”
- concluding that an association-in-fact enterprise constitutes a “group of persons associated together for a common purpose of engaging in a course of conduct”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White, Burger, Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens, Stewart, Accordingly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.