Skip to main content
· 6/17/1981

United States v. Turkette

Citations

  • 452 U.S. 576
  • 101 S. Ct. 2524
  • 69 L. Ed. 2d 246
  • 1981 U.S. LEXIS 32
  • 49 U.S.L.W. 4743

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that, although enterprise and pattern are distinct elements of racketeering, evidence proving these elements “may in particular cases coalesce”
  • holding that the term “enterprise” as used in RICO is not restricted to criminal enterprises
  • holding that the term \enterprise\ as used in RICO is not restricted to criminal enterprises
  • holding that RICO applies to both legitimate and illegitimate enterprises because the statute refers only to “enterprises”
  • holding that an “enterprise” is “a group of persons associated together for a common purpose of engaging in a course of conduct”
  • concluding that an association-in-fact enterprise constitutes a “group of persons associated together for a common purpose of engaging in a course of conduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White, Burger, Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens, Stewart, Accordingly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.