United States v. Karl R. Huber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• pattern of racketeering activity, involving fraudulent execution of medical services and supplies contracts by a group of corporations
• absent evidence to the contrary, ordinary practice sufficient to prove mailing for purposes of mail fraud where receipt is conceded
• though not directly faced with issue, court assumes that district court has jurisdiction and implies that it has discretion under § 1963(c) to avoid unconstitutionally harsh applications of forfeiture
• district court intervention may be appropriate “where the forfeiture threatens disproportionately to reach untainted property of a defendant”
• “[A] list beginning with the word ‘includes’ ... is not exhaustive but merely illustrative.”
• “[A] list beginning with the word ‘includes’ ... is not- exhaustive but merely illustrative.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).