Skip to main content
· 1/11/1982

United States v. Michael G. Thevis, Alton Bart Hood, Global Industries, Inc., Anna Jeanette Evans

Citations

  • 665 F.2d 616
  • 9 Fed. R. Serv. 1025
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 22706

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that immunity issue involves balancing of public interests that should be left to executive branch
  • reasoning that communicated by the court in its jury instructions. identification was adequately addressed through cross- Instructions have an advantage over experts in that they can examination
  • reasoning that identification was adequately addressed through cross-examination
  • witness killed after he testified before the grand jury but before he was scheduled to testify at trial
  • application of clear and convincing standard to determine whether defendant waived right of confrontation by reason of his own misconduct
  • “In addition, the ‘clear and convincing’ standard of proof dictates that close cases must be resolved in favor of the defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kravitch, Clark, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.