Skip to main content
· 5/5/1989

United States v. Maria Velarde Anguiano

Citations

  • 873 F.2d 1314
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6219
  • 1989 WL 44549

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he issue of whether the evidence was sufficient to support the giving of a multiple conspiracies instruction should be subject to de novo review.”
  • “[T]he issue of whether the evidence was sufficient to support the giving of a multiple conspiracies instruction should be subject to de novo review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson, Beezer, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.