United States v. Eddie L. Ayers, and Gregory R. Ayers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “subsequent acts of concealing large amounts of cash are highly probative of an intent to defraud the United States in the collection of income taxes”
• holding that purchasing cashiers checks in amounts less than $10,000 and submitting false customs declarations are sufficiently similar because both are “acts which conceal the ownership of cash from the government”
• finding that subsequent acts taking place over the course of two years after the charged crime were not too remote
• holding that the police had the right to execute the warrant, notwithstanding the defendant's mother's statement that the defendant did not reside at the residence, because the police had independently confirmed the address in their investigation
• upholding search where officers were told after arriving to execute a warrant that the suspect no longer lived at the residence
• affirming conspiracy convic- tion and concluding that “the acquittal of all conspirators but one does not necessarily indicate that the jury found no agree- ment” with the acquitted co-conspirators

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).