· 1/18/1989
United States v. James Gerald Bryan
Citations
- 868 F.2d 1032
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 355
- 1989 WL 2192
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the disclosure obligation under Brady turns on \the extent to which the prosecutor has knowledge of and access to the documents sought.\
- “[G]iving ‘government’ its broadest reading by expanding it to include all federal agencies (such as the IRS) would not only wreak havoc, but would give the defense access to information not readily available to the prosecution.” (alteration in original) (citation omitted)
- “[G]iving ‘government’ its broadest reading by expanding it to include all federal agencies (such as the IRS) would not only wreak havoc, but would give the defense access to information not readily available to the prosecution.” (alteration in original) (citation omitted)
- “The prosecutor will be deemed to have knowledge of and access to anything in the possession, custody or control of any federal agency participating in the same investigation of the defendant.”
- “The prosecutor will be deemed to have knowledge of and access to anything in the possession, custody or control of any federal agency participating in the same investigation of the defendant.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wallace, Reinhardt, Hardy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.