· 4/19/2011
United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.
Citations
- 778 F. Supp. 2d 8
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42043
- 2011 WL 1479917
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interpreting an order’s language “in conjunction with the purpose to be accomplished” by the injunction
- interpreting Order #1015 by reading its language “in conjunction with the purpose to be accomplished” by the injunction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gladys Kessler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.