· 9/14/2004

United States v. Michael H. Boulware, United States of America v. Michael H. Boulware

Citations

384 F.3d 794
65 Fed. R. Serv. 382
94 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5890
2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 19241

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

where “[t]he district court. [] did not perform a Rule 403 balancing analysis,” the “review [is] de novo”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tashima, Thomas, Silverman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.