United States v. James Edward Roederer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that conduct occurring approximately five years before the offense of conviction constituted relevant conduct.where the conduct was very similar and there was evidence that the defendant had engaged in additional similar conduct in the time between these offenses
• noting that two or more transactions may be considered a part of the same course of conduct
• noting that two or more transactions may be considered a part of the same course of conduct
• noting that two or more transactions may be considered a part of the same course of conduct
• noting that must no longer limit their review to the evidence dealing “[t]he amended version [o f § 2D1.1(b)(1)] now conforms to U.S.S.G. § 1B1.1 (comment. n.1([k])”
• holding “[w]eapon possession is established if the government proves by a preponderance of the evidence that a temporal and spacial relation existed between the weapon, the drug trafficking activity, and the -8- defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).