United States v. Perry A. Graham, United States of America v. Terrence A. Terrell, United States of America v. Roger v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that drug 75 distributing cliques that were in competition with one another were still part of a single conspiracy in part because they shared the common goal of selling one defendant’s cocaine for profit
• rejecting sufficiency of the evidence challenge to narcotics conspiracy conviction where the government’s evidence consisted of testimony from six cooperating drug dealers, all of whom vouched for the existence of a conspiracy and testified that the defendants were part of it
• remand proper where district court erroneously thought it could not depart based upon defendant’s vulnerability to abuse in prison
• quot- ing United States v. Caicedo-Llanos, 960 F.2d 158, 164 n.4 (D.C. Cir. 1992)
• quot- ing United States v. Caicedo-Llanos, 960 F.2d 158, 164 n.4 (D.C. Cir. 1992)
• finding interdependency among cliques that purchased and distributed drugs together

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).