Eugene R. Orner v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of the United States Department of Health & Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that due process required relief from 6 Appellate Case: 22-2129 Document: 010110820504 Date Filed: 03/02/2023 Page: 7 judgment when the burdened party “was not given any notice” of the relevant proceeding and “had no reason whatsoever to anticipate [it]”
• In the context of Rule 60(b)(4), courts look to whether the “fundamental procedural prerequisites—particularly, adequate notice and opportunity to be heard—were fully satisfied.”
• In the context of Rule 60(b)(4), courts look to whether the “fundamental procedural prerequisites—particularly, adequate notice and opportunity to be heard—were fully satisfied.”
• In the context of Rule 60(b)(4), courts look to whether the “fundamental procedural prerequisites—particularly, adequate notice and opportunity to be heard—were fully satisfied.”
• “[W]e may affirm challenged decisions of the district court on alternative grounds, so long as the record is sufficient to permit conclusions of law.”
• “[A] judgment may be void for purposes of Rule 60(b)(4) if entered in a manner inconsistent with due process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).