United States v. Dale McCourtney Hodge, A/K/A Dedan Kimathi Wilson, A/K/A Keith Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of defendant’s previous drug transaction “was relevant and necessary in that it tended to show the existence of a continuing narcotics business” as well as the defendant’s “knowledge of the drug trade and his intent to distribute”
• “[S]tatements of other law enforcement officers ‘are plainly . . . reliable’ even without any special showing.” (quoting United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102, 111 (1965))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).