United States v. George Terzado-Madruga

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no due process violation where the plea agreement required the defense witness to provide truthful testimony
• admitting evidence pursuant to the inevitable discovery and independent source doctrines but not the attenuation doctrine
• admitting evidence pursuant to the inevitable discovery and independent source doctrines but not the attenuation doctrine
• “Simply because the evidence is damaging or prejudicial to a defendant’s case does not mean . . . that the evidence should be excluded.”
• \It is uniformly rec- ognized that weapons are often as much `tools of the trade' as the most commonly recognized narcotics paraphernalia.\
• “It is uniformly rec- ognized that weapons are often as much ‘tools of the trade’ as the most commonly recognized narcotics paraphernalia.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).