Skip to main content
· 4/7/1992

United States v. Paul Y.B. Hahn

Citations

  • 960 F.2d 903
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 4667
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3012
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6158
  • 1992 WL 67202

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Regularity is wanting in the case of a solitary, temporally remote event, and therefore such an event cannot constitute relevant conduct without a strong showing of substantial similarity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tang, Noonan, Shubb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.