United States v. Charles Verdel Farnsworth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding to the district court for failing to make factual findings under Rule 32 because the district court “simply adopt[ed] the presentence report as its finding”
• deeming reliable a hearsay statement made by victim to police that defendant threatened her with a firearm where statement was made contemporaneously with the incident and the defendant had an opportunity to cross-examine the officer who recounted the hearsay
• “Michael Candelaria also indicated that it was the defendant who fired the first shot, which is consistent with the defendant driving over to the southeast part of town and looking to confront Joseph Ramirez”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).