Skip to main content
· 10/15/1991

United States v. David Hooten

Citations

  • 942 F.2d 878
  • 1991 WL 172938

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that this method of proving possession “derives from U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(1
  • remanding for further factual findings where \district court never addressed the question of who owned the pistol\
  • evidence that weapon was found in same location where drugs or drug paraphernalia are stored satisfies Government’s burden
  • evidence that weapon was found in same location where drugs or drug paraphernalia are stored satisfies Government’s burden
  • “The sentencing court may infer foreseeability from the coparticipant’s knowing possession of the weapon.”
  • remanding for findings as to possession of gun

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Duhé, Schwartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.