United States v. Carlos M. Perdomo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a finding of relevance despite the relevant conduct involving “a large quantity of cocaine” and the offense conduct involving “a much smaller quantity”
• “[s]uch a finding 14 of a specific intent to obstruct justice is a prerequisite to the two level enhancement”
• “[s]uch a finding 14 of a specific intent to obstruct justice is a prerequisite to the two level enhancement”
• “The ‘same course of conduct’ concept . . . looks to whether the defendant repeats the same type of criminal activity over time. It does not require that acts be ‘connected together’ by common participants or by an overall scheme.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).