United States v. Amirault

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Dost factors “are neither comprehensive nor necessarily applicable in every situation”
• “[T]he focus should be on the objective criteria of the photograph’s design.”
• “We believe, however, that it is a mistake to look at the actual effect of the photograph on the viewer, rather than upon the intended effect. If Amirault’s subjective reaction were relevant, a sexual deviant’s quirks could turn a Sears catalog into pornography.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

91 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• United States v. Justin Barrett Hill
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-08-11· cited 185×
• United States v. Robert Gerard Horn
  Eighth Circuit· 1999-09-20· cited 180×
• United States v. Al-Moayad
  Second Circuit· 2008-10-02· cited 165×
• United States v. Roderick
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2006-03-08· cited 117×
• United States v. Brunette
  First Circuit· 2001-07-12· cited 116×
• United States v. Rivera
  Second Circuit· 2008-10-15· cited 104×
• United States v. Brown
  Sixth Circuit· 2009-08-26· cited 104×
• Veilleux v. National Broadcasting Co.
  First Circuit· 2000-03-06· cited 98×
• United States v. Frabizio
  First Circuit· 2006-08-16· cited 88×
• United States v. Moon
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2014-08-11· cited 74×
• United States v. Charles Perkins
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-03-13· cited 63×
• United States v. Steen
  Fifth Circuit· 2011-02-25· cited 61×
• State v. Myers
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-04-07· cited 54×
• United States v. Russell
  Seventh Circuit· 2011-11-10· cited 51×
• United States v. Robert Franz
  Third Circuit· 2014-11-04· cited 47×
• People v. Sven
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-05-03· cited 46×
• State v. Morrison
  Utah Supreme Court· 2001-08-21· cited 45×
• United States v. Hill
  C.D. California· 2004-06-17· cited 44×
• United States v. Batchu
  First Circuit· 2013-07-18· cited 42×
• United States v. Wallenfang
  Eighth Circuit· 2009-06-09· cited 41×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
  Supreme Court· 1964-03-09· cited 8,531×
• New York v. Ferber
  Supreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,505×
• Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1984-04-30· cited 2,137×
• Osborne v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 897×
• United States v. Dost
  S.D. California· 1986-06-12· cited 359×
• United States v. Edwin E. Wiegand
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-03-18· cited 269×
• Aids Action Committee of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
  First Circuit· 1994-11-09· cited 173×
• United States v. Stephen A. Knox
  Third Circuit· 1994-06-09· cited 163×
• Bose Corporation v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1982-11-23· cited 91×
• United States v. William Joseph Wolf
  Tenth Circuit· 1989-11-22· cited 86×
• United States v. Sabino Antonio Rubio
  Fifth Circuit· 1988-01-13· cited 79×
• United States v. Michael Arvin
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-04-12· cited 77×
• United States v. David Hilton
  First Circuit· 1999-03-01· cited 64×
• United States v. Edward F. Nolan, Jr.
  First Circuit· 1987-05-14· cited 47×
• Faloona v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.
  N.D. Texas· 1985-05-02· cited 23×

Other cases named United States v. Amirault

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• United States v. Amirault
  First Circuit· 1999-04-06