Tenth Circuit· 11/22/1989
United States v. William Joseph Wolf
Citations
- 890 F.2d 241
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 17484
- 1989 WL 139737
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “the photographer need not portray the victimized child as a temptress”
- noting that “lasciviousness is not a characteristic of the child photographed but of the exhibition that the photographer sets up for an audience that consists of himself or like- minded individuals.”
- requiring a child “to exhibit lust, wantonness, sexual coyness or other inappropriate precocity” “would pervert both the 36 language and the logic of the [child pornography] legislation and the case law”
- “[T]he Ninth [C]ircuit clearly stated that to violate 18 U.S.C. § 2251 the photographer need not portray the victimized child as a temptress.”
- child was asleep when photographs were taken
- par- tially nude and sleeping minor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKay, McWilliams, Brorby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Stephen A. KnoxThird Circuit· 1994-06-09· cited 163×
- United States v. Mervyn Harold Cross A/K/A Eric Cross, and Robert Carter LodgeEleventh Circuit· 1991-04-16· cited 148×
- United States v. AmiraultFirst Circuit· 1999-04-06· cited 121×
- United States v. RoderickCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2006-03-08· cited 117×
- United States v. OvertonNinth Circuit· 2009-07-14· cited 110×
- United States v. RiveraSecond Circuit· 2008-10-15· cited 104×
- United States v. BrownSixth Circuit· 2009-08-26· cited 104×
- United States v. FrabizioFirst Circuit· 2006-08-16· cited 88×
- American Library Association, Appellants/cross-Appellees v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States, Appellees/cross-AppellantsD.C. Circuit· 1992-02-19· cited 88×
- People v. LambornIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-02-19· cited 81×
- United States v. Melvin Hubert HolmesEleventh Circuit· 2016-02-25· cited 65×
- United States v. JohnsonEighth Circuit· 2011-04-05· cited 61×
- People v. KongsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-12-21· cited 60×
- United States v. IsabellaTenth Circuit· 2019-03-12· cited 58×
- United States v. LambN.D. New York· 1996-11-05· cited 57×
- Alexander v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1995-08-03· cited 56×
- United States v. Craig FinleyThird Circuit· 2013-08-12· cited 53×
- Purcell v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2004-11-18· cited 50×
- State v. BagnesUtah Supreme Court· 2014-02-07· cited 48×
- State v. MorrisonUtah Supreme Court· 2001-08-21· cited 45×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 3,038×
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,505×
- United States v. DostS.D. California· 1986-06-12· cited 359×
- United States v. Edwin E. WiegandNinth Circuit· 1987-03-18· cited 269×
- United States v. William Esch, United States of America v. Linda EschTenth Circuit· 1988-01-04· cited 112×
- Chase Revel, Inc. v. StrawSupreme Court· 1987-10-05· cited 83×
- Ferris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-02-29· cited 60×
- United States v. Edward F. Nolan, Jr.First Circuit· 1987-05-14· cited 47×
- Ross v. ZimmermanSupreme Court· 1988-02-29· cited 47×
- United States v. James I. Freeman, United States of America v. Larry Lee BassEighth Circuit· 1987-03-09· cited 28×
- United States v. Calvin Dean ReedyTenth Circuit· 1988-04-26· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.