United States v. Robert Franz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a photograph of a minor sitting nude on a bed with her legs spread apart suggested openness to sexual activity
• noting that a chain of events can “strongly suggest[ ] that whoever received the image did so knowingly”
• explaining that in context, the split jury verdict “strongly suggest[ed] that the jury was . . . not swayed by the prejudicial character of the” child pornography
• explaining that in context, the split jury verdict “strongly suggest[ed] that the jury was . . . not swayed by the prejudicial character of the” child pornography
• “[R]aising an argument for the first time in a motion for reconsideration results in waiver of that argument for pur- poses of appeal.”
• “[R]aising an argument for the first time in a motion for reconsideration results in waiver of that argument for pur- poses of appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).