Aids Action Committee of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that statute could be unconstitutional i f , through its enforcement, it appears to be hostile to expression of certain viewpoints
• holding Rule 9(b) requires plaintiff to \set forth an explanation 14 as to why the statement or omission complained of was false or misleading\
• reviewing the entire record independently to determine whether a government restriction was a content-based or content-neutral
• suggesting, though not holding, that the very existence of a written policy may be a sufficient basis for finding that car interiors are not public fora
• suggesting, though not holding, that the very existence of a written policy may be a sufficient basis for finding that car interiors are not public fora
• stating that light work requires six hours of standing or walking

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).