Skip to main content
· 8/11/2006

United States v. Justin Barrett Hill

Citations

  • 459 F.3d 966
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 20584
  • 2006 WL 2328721

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that an on-site search of a computer “could take many hours and perhaps days” and “would not only impose a significant and unjustified burden on police resources, it would also make the search more intrusive”
  • stating that wholesale seizure of mate- rials is permissible where affidavit in support of warrant pro- vides a reasonable explanation for why such a seizure is necessary
  • evaluating probable cause based on the description of the images in the affidavit and not the images themselves
  • noting that Dost factors had ‘‘utility’’ in context of case
  • noting that officials must explain “why a wholesale seizure is necessary”
  • upholding off-site search of all defendant’s computer storage media for evidence of child pornography

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Goodwin, Fisher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.