United States v. Robert Gerard Horn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the officers could not practically view all the videos at the search site
• concluding that the officers could not practically view all the videos at the search site
• holding the information provide in the affidavit was not stale because Horn was likely to still be in possession of child pornography three or four months later
• concluding images of minors that were “freeze-framed at moments when their pubic areas are most exposed” supported a finding of lasciviousness
• concluding that images of young girls wearing only swimsuit bottoms at a topless beach were lascivious because the images were “freeze-framed at moments when their pubic areas are most exposed” and were “at the center of the image and form the focus of the depiction”
• explaining that nudity alone is insufficient to qualify as a “lascivious exhibition”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).