Skip to main content
· 5/3/2006

People v. Sven

Citations

  • 848 N.E.2d 228
  • 365 Ill. App. 3d 226
  • 302 Ill. Dec. 228
  • 2006 Ill. App. LEXIS 364

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that video depicting nude teenage girl bathing infant put viewer into “role of voyeur,” thus rendering the images lewd
  • concluding that video depicting nude teenage girl bathing infant put viewer into “role of voyeur,” thus rendering the images lewd
  • noting that the defendant instructed his teenage babysitter to get into the bathtub when bathing his infant, purportedly for safety reasons, and then hid a video camera in the bathroom
  • noting that simple nudity, while a factor to consider, is not sufficient in itself to render an image lewd
  • noting that simple nudity, while a factor to consider, is not sufficient in itself to render an image lewd
  • concluding that a hidden stationary recording of a minor in a bathtub satisfied the first factor when some portions of the recording depicted only the bathroom, but all that was visible during other parts of the recording were the minor’s genitals and buttocks

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grometer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.