United States v. Al-Moayad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding cumulative effect of trial court’s errors denied defendants due process of law and fundamentally fair trial (citing cases)
• recognizing the unfairness in “the fact that [the erroneously admitted notes] buttressed the testimony of a witness whose credibility had otherwise been severely damaged”
• vacating convictions based on cumulative effect of various evidentiary errors, as well as trial court’s questionable handling of jury instruction issue
• vacating convictions of Al-Moayad and his co-defendant Mohsen Zayed due to serious evidentiary errors
• vacating convictions of Al-Moayad and his co-defendant Mohsen Zayed due to serious evidentiary errors
• \Rule 901 is satisfied if sufficient proof has been introduced so that a reasonable juror could find in favor of authenticity or identification.\ (internal quotation marks & citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).