United States v. David Hilton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “appears to be” language added prohibition against virtual child pornography to prohibition against actual child pornography as particularly defined in original statute
• holding CPPA survives strict scrutiny review and expressly rejecting the panel’s analysis
• finding that the CPPA is not unconstitutionally overbroad
• finding that the CPPA is not unconstitutionally vague
• “As technology improves and access to technology increases, efforts to eradicate the child pornography industry could be effectively frustrated if Congress were prevented from targeting sexually explicit material that ‘appears to be’ of real children.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).