United States v. Michael Arvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that one of the factors to consider is the captions that appear on the pictures
• noting that the exclusion of expert testimony is reviewed for abuse of discretion
• requiring active engagement would be unreasonable “because children are not necessarily mature enough to project sexuality consciously.”
• \whether the item to be judged is lewd ... is a determination that lay persons can and should make\
• “whether the item to be judged is lewd ... is a determination that lay persons can and should make”
• “Where children are photographed, the sexuality of the depictions often is imposed upon them by the attitude of the viewer or photographer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).